IPFS Explained: How to Store NFTs Securely

  • Home
  • IPFS Explained: How to Store NFTs Securely
Blog Thumb
18 Oct 2025

IPFS Explained: How to Store NFTs Securely

NFT Storage Cost Estimator

Storage Calculator

Estimate your monthly costs for IPFS pinning services based on your NFT storage requirements.

Enter your storage requirements and click 'Calculate Costs' to see estimates.

Note: These are estimated costs only. Actual pricing may vary based on service provider policies and your specific usage patterns.

IPFS is a decentralized, peer‑to‑peer hypermedia protocol that addresses content by cryptographic hash rather than by location. The NFT (non‑fungible token) boom created a huge need for a storage solution that can hold large media files without blowing up blockchain costs. This guide walks you through why IPFS became the go‑to choice, how it actually stores data, and the steps you need to keep your NFTs alive forever.

Quick Takeaways

  • IPFS stores files off‑chain using Content Identifiers (CIDs) that guarantee integrity.
  • Pinning services like Pinata or NFT.Storage keep your data available; without pinning, content can disappear.
  • Alternatives such as Arweave and Filecoin offer different permanence models, but IPFS remains the most widely adopted.
  • Best‑practice checklist: use CID v1, pin with at least two providers, run periodic persistence checks.
  • Common pitfalls include gateway reliance and forgetting to update mutable references (IPNS).

What is IPFS?

In simple terms, IPFS (InterPlanetary File System) turns the web into a giant distributed hash table. When you add a file, IPFS splits it into small chunks, hashes each chunk, and creates a unique CID (Content Identifier) that looks like ipfs://Qm…. That CID is a permanent fingerprint: if the file changes, the CID changes, making tampering instantly visible.

Why Use IPFS for NFT Storage?

Storing media directly on a blockchain like Ethereum is prohibitively expensive - around $50‑$100 per megabyte in 2023. IPFS lets you keep the heavy assets (images, videos, 3D models) off‑chain while the on‑chain token only stores the CID. This hybrid approach solves the "link rot" problem that knocked out 32.7% of Ethereum NFTs minted in 2021, according to a Stanford study. Because the CID is immutable, the token always points to the same piece of content, as long as the file stays pinned.

How IPFS Stores Data: A Step‑by‑Step Walkthrough

  1. Upload your asset (e.g., a PNG) to an IPFS node or a gateway API.
  2. The node generates a CID by hashing the file with SHA‑256 (or SHA3‑256 for CID v1).
  3. The CID becomes part of your NFT metadata JSON, usually under the image field.
  4. When a wallet or marketplace renders the NFT, it reads the CID and fetches the file from the IPFS network via a gateway (e.g., https://ipfs.io/ipfs/<CID>).

The whole process takes seconds, and the resulting link is globally resolvable as long as at least one node is hosting the data.

Two low‑poly pinning service icons securing a digital NFT image.

Pinning: Keeping Your NFTs Alive

IPFS is a peer‑to‑peer network, not a permanent archive. If no node pins a file, garbage‑collection can delete it. Pinning is the act of telling a node to retain the file indefinitely. You have two main options:

  • Pinata (commercial pinning service) - offers API access, dashboards, and pricing starting at $19/month for 1 TB.
  • NFT.Storage (free tier for up to 5 GB, built on Filecoin for redundancy) - perfect for indie creators.

Best practice: pin with at least two providers and run a daily check that the CID resolves.

Choosing a Pinning Service: Pinata vs NFT.Storage

Pinning Service Comparison
FeaturePinataNFT.Storage
Free tierNo5 GB
Paid tier price$19/month for 1 TBPay‑as‑you‑go via Filecoin
API rate limit10 k requests/dayUnlimited (subject to storage quota)
RedundancyMultiple pins on Pinata nodesFilecoin-backed deals ensure long‑term storage
Support24/7 chat & emailCommunity forum + GitHub

If you need enterprise‑grade SLAs, Pinata is the safer bet. For hobby projects, NFT.Storage lets you get started for free and still benefits from Filecoin’s decentralized backup.

Alternatives to IPFS: When Might You Choose Arweave or Filecoin?

Two other decentralized storage solutions compete for NFT use cases:

  • Arweave (pay‑once, store‑forever protocol) - charges a single upfront fee based on a 200‑year storage projection. Great for high‑value art that must never disappear.
  • Filecoin (decentralized storage marketplace using FIL tokens) - you pay miners to store data for a chosen duration. Often combined with IPFS for retrieval.

Both offer stronger permanence guarantees, but they also add complexity and cost. IPFS remains the most popular choice, holding roughly 78% of NFT storage market share in 2023.

Creator at desk monitoring low‑poly IPFS nodes and pinned NFT data.

Best‑Practice Checklist for NFT Creators

  • Generate CIDs using CID v1 (base32) for future‑proofing.
  • Include the CID in the JSON metadata under image and animation_url if needed.
  • Pin the CID with at least two services (e.g., Pinata + NFT.Storage).
  • Run a daily script that calls ipfs ls <CID> to confirm availability.
  • If you need mutable references, use IPNS (InterPlanetary Naming System for mutable pointers) and update the pointer when assets change.
  • Document the pinning provider credentials in a secure vault.

Common Pitfalls and How to Troubleshoot Them

Problem: The NFT image shows a 404 error on marketplaces.

Cause: The CID is not pinned or the gateway you rely on is down.

Fix: Verify the CID resolves via https://ipfs.io/ipfs/<CID>. If it fails, re‑pin using a different service and update the metadata if you switched to a new CID.

Problem: Slow load times for large video NFTs.

Cause: Public gateways add latency; your node may be far from the user’s location.

Fix: Use a dedicated gateway (e.g., Cloudflare’s IPFS gateway) or host a lightweight IPFS node in a region close to your main audience.

Future Outlook: Why IPFS Will Stay Relevant

Industry analysts predict the decentralized storage market will hit $3.8 billion by 2025, with IPFS retaining roughly two‑thirds of that share. New features like NFT.Storage’s Verifiable Storage combine Filecoin proofs with IPFS pins, addressing the biggest risk - loss of content. Layer‑2 integrations (e.g., Optimism’s “NFT Resurrection”) are also adding automated repinning, meaning creators will spend less time on manual upkeep.

Frequently Asked Questions

Do I need to run my own IPFS node to store NFTs?

No. You can upload files through a gateway API or a pinning service. Running your own node gives you extra control but adds maintenance overhead.

What’s the difference between CID v0 and CID v1?

CID v0 uses Base58 and only SHA‑256, while CID v1 supports multiple hash algorithms and can be encoded in Base32, making it compatible with DNSLink and future upgrades.

Can I make NFT data private on IPFS?

Not directly. IPFS content is public by design. To keep data private you must encrypt it before uploading, then store the decryption key off‑chain.

How often should I check my pins?

A daily or weekly health check is recommended for valuable collections. Automated scripts can ping the CID and alert you on failures.

Is IPFS compatible with blockchains other than Ethereum?

Yes. Major chains like Polygon, Solana, and Tezos all accept IPFS URIs in their token metadata standards.

Stuart Reid
Stuart Reid

I'm a blockchain analyst and crypto markets researcher with a background in equities trading. I specialize in tokenomics, on-chain data, and the intersection of digital assets with stock markets. I publish explainers and market commentary, often focusing on exchanges and the occasional airdrop.

View all posts

5 Comments

Marina Campenni

Marina Campenni

October 18, 2025 at 09:19

Thanks for laying out the IPFS basics so clearly; the step‑by‑step walkthrough really demystifies the process for newcomers. I especially appreciate the reminder to pin with at least two services – that redundancy tip can save a lot of headaches later.

Irish Mae Lariosa

Irish Mae Lariosa

October 27, 2025 at 19:01

The guide, while thorough, spends an inordinate amount of time listing vendor pricing without addressing the underlying economic trade‑offs. Pinata’s $19/month tier, for instance, is presented as a simple solution, yet the article fails to examine how such recurring costs scale for collections with thousands of assets. Moreover, the claim that “NFT.Storage is perfect for indie creators” overlooks the fact that its free quota caps at five gigabytes, a limit that many emerging artists quickly outgrow. The author also neglects to mention that both services rely on third‑party nodes, which re‑introduces a single point of failure despite the promised decentralisation. A more nuanced discussion of redundancy, such as the use of two independent pinning providers, would have been valuable. The section on CID versions is accurate, but the recommendation to adopt CID v1 universally ignores the backward‑compatibility issues on legacy marketplaces that still expect CID v0. The checklist, while handy, is overly generic; “run periodic persistence checks” should be expanded to include concrete tooling suggestions, like the ipfs‑pin‑status utility. The breakdown of IPFS versus Arweave and Filecoin is informative, but the cost analysis is superficial. Arweave’s pay‑once model is presented as an alternative without explaining the steep upfront fee that can reach several hundred dollars for a single high‑resolution artwork. Likewise, Filecoin’s storage market dynamics-such as miner reliability and deal renewal-are glossed over, leaving readers with an incomplete picture of long‑term durability. The article also omits discussion of how content‑addressed storage interacts with mutable NFTs that use IPNS, a topic that is growing in relevance as creators experiment with dynamic media. The “Future Outlook” paragraph mentions a $3.8 billion market projection, yet provides no source citation, which undermines credibility. Finally, the guide could benefit from a short case study showing a real‑world NFT collection that survived a gateway outage thanks to proper pinning practices. In sum, the guide is a solid primer, but it would serve the community better with deeper critical analysis and practical examples. Readers looking to implement a production‑grade storage strategy should treat this article as a starting point rather than a definitive handbook.

Nick O'Connor

Nick O'Connor

November 6, 2025 at 04:43

Great overview!!!, however, I noticed that the article could benefit from a deeper dive into CID version compatibility, especially when interfacing with older marketplaces, which still expect CID v0, and that nuance is crucial for developers, as well as for collectors, alike.

Deepak Kumar

Deepak Kumar

November 15, 2025 at 14:25

Hey folks, if you’re gearing up to launch an NFT collection, start by installing the IPFS desktop client today – it’s free, user‑friendly, and will let you test pinning locally before committing to a paid service. Once you’ve got your assets uploaded, generate CID v1 hashes, store them in your metadata JSON, and don’t forget to set up a daily cron job that pings your chosen gateways; this habit will catch any pinning hiccups before they become visible to buyers. Remember, community support is just a Discord channel away, so lean on fellow creators when you hit a snag – we’ve all been there, and the collective knowledge pool is massive!

Matthew Theuma

Matthew Theuma

November 25, 2025 at 00:07

Indeed, establishing that routine check feels like a small meditation on permanence, reminding us that digital art, much like physical art, thrives on consistent care 😊. It’s funny how a simple cron job can echo larger life lessons about vigilance and resilience.

Write a comment